Wednesday
Feb222012

AAP Press Statement on President Obama's 2013 Budget

By: Robert W. Block, MD, FAAP, president, American Academy of Pediatrics 

"The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) believes in investing in children’s health and well-being now and in the future. While we strongly support President Obama’s 2013 budget request for funding of Section 5203 of the Affordable Care Act—a new pediatric subspecialty loan repayment program to individuals who commit to pursuing full-time employment in pediatric medical subspecialties and surgical subspecialties—we are profoundly disappointed in his decision to cut federal investments in Children’s Hospitals Graduate Medical Education (CHGME) for a second year in a row.

 “Loan repayment will indeed go a long way to help pediatric subspecialists manage the cost of medical education, but without a sufficient investment in training the next generation of general pediatricians and expanding the ranks of pediatric subspecialists and pediatric surgical specialists in the United States, access to specialized children’s health care services will continue to deteriorate. There is already an unsustainable shortage of pediatric subspecialists in this country, and continuing to inadequately fund CHGME will exacerbate the problem. 

“Today, approximately one in three American children must travel 40 miles or more to receive care from a pediatrician certified in adolescent medicine, developmental and behavioral pediatrics, neurodevelopment disabilities, pulmonology, emergency medicine, nephrology, rheumatology, or sports medicine. And for many pediatric subspecialties in parts of the country, families must wait as long as three months just to get an appointment with the right specialist to care for their child. 

“As the number of American children with chronic conditions like obesity, diabetes and asthma continues to rise and the number of pediatricians and specialists available to care for them declines, we need to do everything necessary to increase investments in the pediatric workforce. While subspecialty loan repayment is a good first step, we should not be cutting back on federal resources for programs like CHGME.” 

###

The American Academy of Pediatrics is an organization of 60,000 primary care pediatricians, pediatric medical subspecialists and pediatric surgical specialists dedicated to the health, safety and well-being of infants, children, adolescents and young adults. (www.aap.org)

Monday
Feb202012

Facing potential doctor shortage, N.J. Senate approves bill for action

New Jersey could have 2,800 fewer physicians by 2020

A bill which would require the state Health and Senior Services commissioner to convene a planning summit to examine an expected shortage of physicians practicing in New Jersey was approved Monday by the state Senate.

The legislation (S-173), was introduced in response to a report issued by the Physician Workforce Policy Task Force in 2010 which predicts a shortfall of nearly 3,000 doctors in the the state by 2020, including 1,000 primary care physicians and 1,800 specialists.

The measure seeks to address that shortage by requiring the health commissioner to convene a planning summit comprised of relevant state agencies, boards and representatives of New Jersey medical schools and teaching hospitals.

The summit would be charged with analyzing the physician workforce supply, discussing the redistribution or expansion of residency slots to address shortages and investigating ways to include more hospitals in resident rotations in family medicine, internal medicine and pediatric medicine.

“A recently completed report predicts that within the next decade, New Jersey will face a shortage of thousands of physicians practicing in family care and important specialties,” Sen. Robert Singer (R-Ocean), a co-sponsor, said. “Unless we get to work now to prevent that shortage, many New Jerseyans may soon find themselves without doctors or unable to obtain appointments or treatments when they need them.”

“Part of the problem is that many of the doctors who go to medical school in New Jersey and train in our hospitals end up leaving the state to practice elsewhere,” Sen. Dawn Marie Addiego (R-Burlington), a co-sponsor, added. “The planning summit created by this legislation will help us to determine why doctors, especially specialists in critical fields, are fleeing New Jersey. Once we understand why it is happening, we can create and enact a plan to help us retain the doctors that our residents need.”

—TOM HESTER SR., NEWJERSEYNEWSROOM.COM

Thursday
Feb162012

How states are keeping doctors from moving out

In the face of physician shortages, they are focusing efforts on keeping medical students and residents within state boundaries.

By CAROLYNE KRUPA, amednews staff. 

 View interactive graphic


Widespread concerns about physician shortages have many states working to keep doctors trained in medical schools and residency programs there from crossing state lines to practice medicine.

Nationwide, there were 258.7 active physicians per 100,000 people in 2010, according to new statistics from the Assn. of American Medical Colleges. In individual states, ratios range from a high of 415.5 physicians per 100,000 people in Massachusetts to a low of 176.4 per 100,000 in Mississippi.

On average, only 39% of U.S. physicians practice in the same state where they went to medical school. Forty-eight percent practice in the state where they completed graduate medical education, said the report, released Dec. 2 by the AAMC Center for Workforce Studies.

As a result, medical schools, hospitals, medical societies and state legislatures increasingly are taking a practical approach to retain the physicians and doctors-in-training they already have, said Christiane Mitchell, AAMC director of federal affairs.

"We see states becoming more and more sensitive to the physician shortage issue," she said. "People are beginning to recognize the need."

Nearly half of doctors practice medicine in the same state where they did their residencies.

Physician shortages nationwide are projected to reach 62,900 doctors by 2015 and 91,500 by 2020, according to 2010 AAMC projections. Many states have responded by opening new medical schools or expanding existing ones. Several offer incentives such as bonuses, scholarships or loan repayment programs to keep physicians from leaving.

Communities also are developing new residency programs in hopes that physicians will develop long-term professional and personal relationships during GME training that will tie them to the area, Mitchell said.

Recruitment and retention often go hand in hand. For example, many medical schools recruit students from the states in which they are located, with the idea that students are more likely to practice in their home state. But such efforts can be thwarted if there aren't enough GME positions for those students after graduation, Mitchell said.

"There are certain schools that their entire mission is to train physicians from their states to practice in their states," she said. "But if there are not enough [GME] training positions there, they are going to go somewhere else."

Enticing doctors to stay

Several recent efforts in Iowa are designed to attract physicians most likely to stay in the state. Iowa is below national averages, retaining 22% of its medical school graduates and 37% of physicians who complete GME training there, the AAMC report says.

"We train people and then we send them all over the country," said Lawrence Hutchison, MD, president of the Iowa Medical Society and a family physician in Dubuque, Iowa. "We need to keep the best and brightest in Iowa."

Many osteopathic medical schools have a core mission to train primary care physicians for their states and communities.

To help stem the outflow, the medical society three years ago developed a database of doctors in residency programs nationwide who have some connection to Iowa. The database is used in physician recruitment, and includes doctors who were born in Iowa, went to medical school there or are doing residency training in the state.

"We decided to really focus on people with ties to Iowa," Dr. Hutchison said. "It just doesn't do us a lot of good to recruit from Idaho, Minnesota or Texas, because those people just end up going back home."

The medical society has a mentor program that matches medical students with practicing Iowa physicians. There also are opportunities for residents or medical students to spend a month or more working in a community medical practice.

"We want to give students exposure to what real medical practice is like out in Iowa," Dr. Hutchison said.

Several states -- including Kansas, Mississippi and Alabama -- offer loan repayment programs for doctors to practice locally, said Glen Stream, MD, president of the American Academy of Family Physicians and a family physician in Spokane, Wash.

Some programs have been in place for decades. In Oklahoma, the Physician Manpower Training Commission began in 1975. The state-funded commission offers scholarships and loans to medical students and residents who agree to practice in rural Oklahoma for a set amount of time, said Rick Ernest, commission executive director. For example, a medical student may accept four years of tuition assistance in exchange for practicing in an Oklahoma community for four years.

The program has had positive results, Ernest said. Unlike many rural states, Oklahoma is above national averages, retaining 48% of its medical school graduates and 52% of physicians who complete residency training there, according to the AAMC. Retention is even higher -- 74% -- for physicians who completed both medical school and GME training in the state.

"Our program has helped keep more physicians in the state," he said.

Training locally

New residency programs are a proven way for states to train and keep physicians, but starting them is a challenge, said Mitchell, of the AAMC. Medicare funding for existing residency programs has been frozen since the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, but new residency programs at institutions that have never had them before can qualify for federal funding.

Such institutions have three years to develop their programs before funding is capped. Meanwhile, the federal Health Resources and Services Administration is providing funding for new residency programs at community health centers.

One example of a school seeking to retain more physicians by offering GME is Florida Atlantic University's Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine. In November, the school announced it was partnering with five southeast Florida hospitals in a GME consortium projected to create as many as 350 residency positions there within the next few years. School officials said the program will help alleviate physician shortages in the state.

Many osteopathic medical schools -- such as new schools in Harrogate, Tenn., and Yakima, Wash. -- have a core mission to train primary care physicians for the states and communities where they are located, said Stephen Shannon, DO, MPH, president of the American Assn. of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine.

The University of Kentucky College of Medicine in Lexington has pipeline programs designed to attract students from the state, and offers debt relief primarily through the state Office of Rural Health, said Emery Wilson, MD, dean emeritus of the medical college.

"It's very important for us to raise our own physicians here and keep them here, because we are probably not going to get many physicians coming in from other states," he said.

The school also opened a satellite campus in Morehead, Ky., and is considering a second elsewhere in the state to give third- and fourth-year students the opportunity to experience rural medicine first-hand.

"That is the latest in what we hope to be a successful way to not only get doctors to practice in Kentucky, but to get primary care physicians to stay," Dr. Wilson said.

http://www.ama-assn.org

Tuesday
Feb142012

Success of health reform hinges on hiring 30,000 primary care doctors by 2015

By Sarah Kliff Published: February 10 

On a chilly afternoon at a community clinic in Southeast Washington, three young doctors are busily laying the foundation for the health-care law’s success.

Jacob Edwards flips through a manual on skin conditions, diagnosing a rash that looks like chicken pox. Jessica O’Babatunde consults her supervisor on treating an adolescent’s obesity, which is literally off-the-charts. And Julie Krueger peppers 3-year-old Daphauni with questions at her physical: How do you spell your name? What did you eat for breakfast? What’s your favorite vegetable? (Cheese.)

They are primary-care residents at Children’s National Medical Center. A third of their class has more than $200,000 each in student loan debt. At the end of residency, they can stay in primary care and earn $29.58 an hour. Or they can specialize and make $74.45. Over a lifetime, a medical student who specializes can expect to earn $3.5 million more.

The Obama administration — and, arguably, the American health-care system — desperately needs them to choose primary care.

Decades of research have confirmed that more specialists leads to more specialty care, which leads to a more expensive system. Now, with the passage of the Affordable Care Act, tens of millions of previously uninsured Americans will be looking for a primary-care doctor. It is no exaggeration to say that the success of the health-care law rests on young doctors choosing to do something that is not in their economic self-interest.

The surprise of the health-care overhaul, at least thus far, is that so many young doctors are cooperating. The number of American medical students matching into primary care residencies jumped 20 percent between 2009 and 2011, according to the Association of American Medical Colleges.

“Regardless of what people think about the health reform legislation, or what side of the aisle people are on, the debate shone a significant light on the importance of primary care,” says Glen Stream, president of the American Academy of Family Physicians. “There was more attention paid to the importance of primary care, the cost-effectiveness of it and that we’re facing a worsening shortage.”

That worsening shortage, he says, has to do with the economics, with nearly every incentive working against going into primary care.

“No matter what speciality you’re going into, your medical education costs the same,” Stream says. “Think about a medical student who is sort of interested in primary care and has got $250,000 in debt. People are often driven by financial incentives, and you basically get the outcome that you incent. Health-care workforce is not different from any other sector in that regard.”

As with speciality doctors, specialty residents bring a hospital more lucrative business. A radiologist will earn a hospital $193 in Medicare reimbursements every hour, a primary-care doctor brings in $101, according to an analysis done for a congressional watchdog agency.

“What hospitals build, in terms of their residency training, has a lot to do with what business they’ll bring in,” says Robert Phillips, director of the Robert Graham Center, which studies health-care workforce issues. “If they have a choice between funding a primary-care residency or one in cardiology, the cardiology residency will make them a lot more money. It’s a perfect storm that aligns the incentives against everything other than primary care.”

Huge projected shortfall

The greatest threat to the health-care overhaul might not be the Supreme Court, which is scheduled to hear challenges to the law next month. Or the shifting alliances of an election year. In the end, it’s more likely to be a lack of medical providers. If the law succeeds in extending health insurance to 32 million more Americans, there won’t be enough doctors to see them. In fact, the anticipated shortfall of primary-care providers, by 2015, is staggering: 29,800.

The Obama administration’s options to address that threat are limited. It does have Medicare, which covers the lion’s share of the cost of training medical residents: In 2009, it spent $9.5 billion on residents’ stipends, teaching physicians’ salaries and related expenses. But when Congress passed the balanced budget amendment in 1996, it capped the number of residencies that Medicare can fund. Since then, hospitals’ slots have been tethered to 1996 levels.

The health overhaul, some hoped, would address that issue. But with the health insurance expansion’s $971 billion price tag — and the Obama administration goal to keep the law’s cost under $1 trillion — funds for more slots didn’t turn up.

In the context of a $1 trillion overhaul, the White House’s main effort on this front seems modest: a $167 million sliver of the $15 billion Prevention and Public Health Fund created as part of the health-care law.

“It’s good,” Stream says, “but it’s also a drop in the bucket.”

Last summer the White House launched the Primary Care Residency Expansion at 82 hospitals across the country, with two strings attached: The programs must train residents dedicated to primary care, and the residents must work in underserved areas.

Medical students see good reasons not to sign up, as primary-care doctors often find themselves at the bottom of the pecking order. Research published last month in the journal Family Medicine found that medical students, even those planning to pursue careers in primary care, viewed the work lives of primary-care doctors more negatively than those of other doctors.

“The income gap that stratifies much of society often stratifies the physician community as well,” a 2009 report on primary care from the Robert Graham Center concluded. “The ‘heart hospital’ side of a medical campus may have fountains and artwork, while the mental image of the primary-care offices is a necessarily full waiting room of a practice where physicians see 40 or more patients a day.”

Those differences help explain the country’s primary-care doctor shortage. They also make an impression on medical students like Reem Nubani, a 30-year-old student at Southern Illinois University interviewing for residency slots.

“It has this connotation that you don’t make much money or you’re not as smart,” says Nubani, who is considering primary care. “Sometimes I feel like it may be even harder in primary care because you still have to know a little bit about everything.”

When the White House launched its residency program, it wasn’t sure medical students would show up. In fact, they snapped up all 172 slots funded in its first year. “The thing we were really thrilled about is that all the positions were filled,” said Kathleen Klink of the Health Resources and Services Administration.

Children’s National Medical Center in the District is among 82 hospitals that were funded. Children’s grant is among the largest, at $3.8 million, and doubled the hospital’s community health residency to 24 students. Some of those new doctors are assigned to the Children’s community clinic on Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE, about two miles from the Capitol, where Congress passed the health-care overhaul in 2010.

The clinic’s patients are arguably among those who will benefit most from the law’s primary-care expansion. In 1993, the federal government declared the surrounding neighborhood, east of the Anacostia river, a health professional shortage area and, to this day, it has too few doctors to serve its residents.

The doctor shortage correlates with striking disparities between the health of its residents and those who live across the river. Ward 8 residents are eight times more likely to die of heart disease than residents of Washington’s tony upper Northwest neighborhoods in Ward 3, according to a 2008 Rand Corp. analysis. In Ward 8, 33.3 percent of adults are obese, compared with 9.3 percent in Ward 3.

The primary-care focus of the Children’s community clinic has attracted students such as Jacob Edwards, 34, who grew up in a low-income, predominantly African American neighborhood in Atlanta. Health-care specialists were hard to come by, he said. Edwards had asthma as a child and remembers his mother driving him 20 miles to see his doctor. “Especially in larger cities, you have higher rates of asthma and an inequality of medicine based on what community you come from,” he says. “I wanted to help bridge that gap.”

At Children’s, the care Edwards provides goes well behind medicine. “You end up referring patients to get assistance with basic needs, housing and basic bill paying,” Edwards says.

The health-care law bolstered Edwards’s confidence in his decision to join the front line of public health.

For “pediatricians,” he says, “I think there will definitely be a demand and a need for an increasing workforce.”

Familiar hopes

Atul Grover entertained such hopes nearly two decades ago as a young medical student who had watched President Bill Clinton and lawmakers battle over national health-care legislation.

Health management organizations — which emphasized primary care as a way to limit the use of expensive specialists — were booming. So were primary-care residencies: 40 percent of medical students pursued them in 1997, an all-time high.

“There was a very clear signal,” says Grover, who completed a primary-care residency at the University of California at San Francisco. “If you want to be employed, you need to go into primary care. If you want to drive a cab, take something in anesthesiology.”

Phillips, of the Robert Graham Center, graduated around the same time and remembers the era similarly. “There was this groundswell of energy that primary care would be the centerpiece for an effective health-care system,” he said. “We were obviously a bit naive and optimistic.”

The Clinton health-care plan failed. Consumers revolted against HMOs’ limited networks, and the insurance plans rapidly lost market share. As for family doctors? They now earn $150,000 less, on average, than anesthesiologists, according to the American Medical Group Association.

“In the early 1990s, there was a lot of potential,” Phillips says. “By time I was in residency, that was already waning.”

These days, Phillips, Grover and others say the current primary-care craze could end much the same way. The Prevention Fund’s residency financing runs out in 2015, and administration officials say there are no plans to extend the program.

“What I worry about is young physicians being told for a couple of years that this is totally worth it, and then it doesn’t pan out and then they get discouraged,” Grover says. “Unfortunately, I think we are moving in that direction.”

Kliff wrote this article with the assistance of the Dennis A. Hunt Fund for Health Journalism, which is administered by the California Endowment Health Journalism Fellowships, a program of the University of Southern California’s Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism.

www.washingtonpost.com

Friday
Feb102012

Increasing pay for primary care doctors, why it matters

Mike Stephens, Action for Better Healthcare

The current shortage of primary care physicians has received a great deal of attention in recent years, but very little has happened to impact or reverse the trend and the problem just continues to get worse.

The reasons for the shortage are familiar. In a 2011 survey by the Medical Group Management Association, the median compensation for primary care physicians was about $202,000.  This is about half or less of what surgical specialists or even internal medicine subspecialists earn. 

Rather than choosing to become general internists, residents are selecting more lucrative medical subspecialties or positions as hospitalists. Other well established general internists have started concierge practices, reducing significantly the number of patients in the practice.

An article in the Wall Street Journal focused on the plans of two major health insurers to increase payments to primary care physicians hoping it will result in significant reductions in medical expenditures in the future. The insurers point out that primary care spending represents about 6 to 8 percent of medical claims processed each year. By encouraging primary care physicians to become more involved in treatment plans and to manage chronic diseases more effectively, health insurers hope significant savings will result from reductions in specialty physician referrals and hospitalization.

WellPoint will offer primary care physicians a fee increase of around 10 percent, with the possibility of additional payments that could boost what they are paid for treating patients.

Aetna plans to start paying primary care physicians across its network an extra fee of $2 to $3 per patient per month if their practices are certified as meeting certain standards for providing access to patients and coordinating their care.

One big question is whether higher payments from insurance companies are significant enough to change the way physicians work. However if other health insurers embrace this payment change it could have a significant impact. One primary care medical group whose practice is part of a pilot project involving WellPoint and six other health insurers reports it earned an additional $100,000 from insurers over the past year as part of the pilot program.

While these private health insurance initiatives are still in their infancy, they may provide earlier results than the more complex, regulated accountable care organizations. Whether the increased payments will be substantial enough to encourage more physicians to choose primary care remains to be seen. But at least there is now a starting point for change.

 

All rights belong to www.healthcarefinancenews.com